Obama Caucus FRAUD by Dr. Long

[DeeDee]

Dr. Long is a staunch Hillary supporter and provides an in depth report on the Obama campaign fraud which includes video footage.

I knew a long report would be submitted in time for the DNC Convention, and it looks like they made good on their word. Obama is toast.

Breaking: Caucus Irregularities, a New Web Site Created by Dr. Lynette Long

By SusanUNPC


From Dr. Lynette Long, whose writings you have read here and who was a guest on NoQuarter Radio (listen to the archived show, “Caucus Irregularities“):


Announcing the Launch of “CAUCUS FRAUD” — a Website Devoted Specifically to Caucus Fraud.
If you think caucuses are boring, think again. At the caucus fraud website you’ll find

• An in-depth analysis of each of the 14 caucus states
• Over 100 Videos that take you inside a caucus
• Gripping Eyewitness Reports of Caucus Fraud
• Private Emails and Testimonials Never Seen Before
• Articles and Videos on Obama’s 4 day Induction Camp - Camp Obama
• And for the geeks in the crowd, election results, demographics, caucus rules and poll results.
• And lots, lots, more.

If you think you know what happened at the caucuses – think again.

Dr. Long writes:

INTRODUCTION

In two weeks the Democratic Party will formally nominate Barack Obama as its candidate for President of the United States.


It's the triumph of fraud.


I've spent the past two months immersed in data from the 2008 Democratic caucuses. After studying the procedures and results from all fourteen caucus states, interviewing dozens of witnesses, and reviewing hundreds of personal stories, my conclusion is that the Obama campaign willfully and intentionally defrauded the American public by systematically undermining the caucus process.

This site represents the fruits of my research. It's a work in progress, obviously, and also a central repository for a vast array of data: articles and blog posts from around the web, personal emails to me, interviews with witnesses, affidavits and testimonials, campaign communications, and videos of the caucuses themselves.


I have elected to make this information public. I hope that it sheds light on the caucus process and inspires reform or total elimination of the caucuses. I also hope it gives pause to those Democrats who believe that Barack Obama is the rightful nominee and that Hillary supporters should just "get over it." I have been a Democrat my entire life, but I will not support the Democratic Party at the cost of democracy.


Lynette Long
August 2008

[Cathreina]

Concerns about high voter turnout and the inability of the precincts to adequately handle the number of participants and monitor the election process are rampant. A book could be written on The Texas Caucus Story, but it seems important to list at least a few of the more blatant complaints here. -Dr. Long

I totally agree with her complaint as far as the TX Caucus. Delegates took footage of the chaos both locally and state wide where Obama supporters/voters were left off the voting list and waited into the wee hours of the next day to cast their vote. After the dust settled, HRC just didn't have TX in the bag as her staff claimed.

[DeeDee]

The Clinton legal team has approximately 200 affidavits they gathered in Texas regarding fraud.

The doc writes......

A source that I have good reason to believe is trustworthy supplied the information below to Wampum and Corrente — which I’ve suitably anonymized — on issues with the TX caucuses. I think there’s a story here; interested journalists may contact me for a referral. Regardless, the story should have a thorough airing; my source is said to be in possession of affidavits (the missing piece in the story as covered). Example:

At the Precinct Convention, _____ said the Chair asked for a “show of hands” of how many people wanted to be delegates and then the Chair appointed “7 delegates to Obama and 6 for Clinton.” The Obama captain called in FALSE results. She said the actual results were 74 Clinton and 33 Obama (total votes) which translates 9 for Clinton and 4 for Obama of 13 delegates. Obama supporters did not allow Hillary supporters to review the results of the count or participate in the math.

Example:

The election judge left early and gave the packet [of election materials] to an unidentified individual. No Clinton chair was present. Our captain and volunteers were not allowed to participate in the calculation of delegates or in the reporting and the unidentified individual called in the results, which ______ believes should be Clinton 13 and Obama 0. It is uncertain what was reported.

Example:

_________ reports she saw an Obama person writing “Obama” as a preference for HRC voters where there were blanks in the sign in sheets. The Obama person also tried to turn her away because she did not have a voter card. Temp chair was with Obama. Perm chair is an HRC supporter. People left as Beckie argued for 15 to 20 minutes that the precinct log should be checked. The Obama person shouted an announcement that anyone without a voter card should leave.

Example:

Precinct 61, a 19 delegate precinct: Voter ________ reports that the delegate calculations were not correct. A “young guy with glasses,” was somehow appointed chair. BHO people dominated the convention despite being heavily out-numbered. Supporters numbered: 89 HRC, 16 BHO, 1 Richardson, 2 uncommitted, but the initial delegate calculation was 16 delegates for HRC, 16 delegate for BHO. A coin flip somehow converted two uncommitted voters into BHO delegates to break the “tie” of 16 delegates each. _________ believes the reported results were 16HRC/18BHO but should have been 16HRC/ 3BHO.

Example:

At 7:05pm at the Precinct Convention, all of the voting for the primary was complete and all of the caucus goers were seated. ________ reported that the Obama chair waited an hour and said “we did not expect this many people so we will have to move” when no move was necessary. The chair said “just sign your name and address and then you can leave.” When asked “what about our presidential preference?” the Obama chair replied “we don’t have time for that…just write your name and address.”

Example:

At the Precinct Convention, Obama supporters told 70-100 Hillary supporters to leave and the majority of them left, including a number of elderly people. Obama supporters took over the packet and the convention. These people are believed to have signed in and to have cast their presidential preference.

That’s part of the unreported record; I selected incidents reported by voters, not party or campaign operatives.
Was this undemocratic, delegitimizing, and possibly criminal behavior by (some) Obama supporters widespread in TX? The argument can certainly be made that this is the reason for the gross disparity between the results of the full-fledged secret ballot election and the caucuses. Because we’ve got over 2000 claims of rules violiations, with reports of potentially criminal handling of election packets in 16 precincts, and lockouts of Clinton supporters in 11.*** Tendentiously: It’s not that the Obama team is better organized; the issue is better organized at doing what, exactly….
Finally, as a sidelight, I should say that some insiders say that the Clinton legal team had access to plenty of data of this kind, including affidavits, but chose the strategy of working within the rules set by the Texas Democratic Party to maximize the delegate count on a case-by-case basis. If that’s true, it looks like the RBC aren’t the only ones to make Florida 2000 a process to emulate, rather than a horror to avoid.
* * *
If I were a journalist—alas, it looks like the El Paso Times is in the tank for Obama, so local coverage is no good — instead of a C list blogger, I’d want answers to the following questions: Ask the Clinton legal team to provide the approximately 200 affidavits they gathered in Texas.
Ask the county TDP chairs to provide any evidence in their possession of irregularities from either side.
Ask witnesses to go on the public record. Only once, on the Mario Solice Marich radio show, has a witness in El Paso been asked by the media to discusses what they saw.
Ask caucus goers in other states if they had similar experiences as Texans.
Ask staffers from all campaigns to recall the worst irregularities they are aware of.
Ask all involved if they believe caucuses were legitimate this cycle.
Review polling data (such as at the NYT and CNN) to see if caucuses in Texas and elsewhere disenfranchised minority groups, in particular, Hispanics.
* * *